Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR827 14
Original file (NR827 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TUR
Docket No: 827-14

13 February 2015

This is in reference to your applica tion for correction of your
7 Uni 4

naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10
States Code, Section 1552.

BF

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

 

 

    

application on 3 February 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in Support EE Yeor your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a iod 1 duty on 23
February 1989 You sez about ur m
Gisciplinary incident. However, during cual 19 June
to 11 December 1989, you were convicted by -martial
(SCM) on three occasions and received nonj men
(NTP) on three occasions. Your offenses a © go to
Your aPPpo inted place of duty, breaking re On; rongful
po sion of a knife, wrongful use of marijuana, four perio

Ss ficat

SSienes from your appointed place of duty, two e i
failure to obey a lawful order, and two periods of authorize
absence (UA) totalling 12 days.

On 16 February 1990, you were convicted by special court-martial
(SPCM) of resisting arrest, assaulting a poli ce officer, and

wrongful distribution of marijuana. You were sentenced to
confinement for six months, a $2,880 forfeiture of pay, and a bad
conduct discharge (BCD). Subsequently, the BCD was approved at

all levels of review, and on 2 July 1990, you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion that the
drugs you had in your possession did not belong to you.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant relief in your case because of the
seriousness of your repetitive misconduct, which included drug
abuse. Finally, there is no evidence in the record, and you
submitted none, to support your assertion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board
within one year from the date of the Board’s decision. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden
is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

 

OBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1837 14

    Original file (NR1837 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction .of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6797 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR6797 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR657 14

    Original file (NR657 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11283-11

    Original file (11283-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05765-09

    Original file (05765-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02309-09

    Original file (02309-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 March 1990 a second ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1610 14

    Original file (NR1610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. .Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03537-08

    Original file (03537-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12509 14

    Original file (NR12509 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, - Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Asa result, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12070 14

    Original file (NR12070 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015.. Asa result, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug under other ‘than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, which was in direct Gisregard to the Navy's ‘Zero Tolerance’ Policy, and conviction by civil authorities for possession of marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a...